|
Challenging for a lot of reasons. |
I ran out of open water too quickly in Berks County this
morning, and I left my phone in the car, to boot, but I landed two lovely, wild
browns tossing (flipping, really) an olive bugger with the spinning rod on a
tiny limestoner in the Oley Valley before I hit new posted signs. Time to knock on doors next time I am in the
area, I suppose. Also disappointing is that
good stretches of two nearby creeks now require a permit or club membership to
fish on the private, although otherwise-unposted, land. Great for the local TU members and club, I am
sure, but not great for license owners in the rest of SEPA who have quietly
fished these waters for decades. I
partially blame the Class A lists made public and interactively mapped on the
PFBC website a few years ago.
|
Got a couple here before I ran out of access. |
The interactive maps are a great resource, no doubt, but
information that was once shared only by word of mouth or earned by on the
ground recon was made open to any mildly tech-savvy angler in the country. I personally have found many “secret” spots
by using those maps as a jumping off point, so I am part of the problem! I respect the private land, however, and I
have travelled miles to find creeks totally off limits, and I left them
alone. It is important to know that
these lists promise zero access to the creeks, but I am sure many folks just
simply pulled into a roadside cut-off and traipsed through posted land, taking
the PFBC lists as endorsements to fish. And,
in their defense, in the early years of this information made so readily
accessible, it was an easy assumption to make.
Much harder to grasp: So the PFBC was allowed to survey a watershed by
landowners to determine if it sustains a wild population of fish, but this land
may or may not be open to fishing??? It’s
even more complicated because many of the creeks are not assessed by sampling
any longer; they are assessed by informed assumptions about local streams in
the same watershed and other scientific methods (some “scientific” too, I am
sure).
|
Still open to fishing even though it's on private land. |
Berks, Bucks, Northampton, Lehigh, Lancaster, Chester, Montgomery,
honestly most SEPA counties have limestone influenced creeks that were a
somewhat secret haven for wild trout enthusiasts, and now most are posted with
fresh signs because more than one overeager angler left too big of a footprint
or scoffed boundaries and signs. I was chased from a creek in Bucks County myself this spring when I
unwittingly pushed too far into a private farm that probably had bad
experiences in recent years.
|
A pretty brown chewing the walt's worm. |
Thankfully, these lovely limestoners eventually feed a
still-open stretch of the Manatawny Creek, so my second stop of the morning
yielded a bunch of healthy stocked and holdover fish from the walk-in section
of the creek. It was Good Friday, so
many fishermen were out, and all tangled with a couple fish. By really working and concentrating on high
stick nymphing, however, I was able to catch an even dozen in a couple
hours. Many were from holes that other
dudes left after coming up fishless. I
am not getting cocky—these are stocked fish not size 26 sipping wilds on the
Letort—but I am confident that I can get fish out of heavily pressured
holes. It’s amazing what confidence,
patience, and a deliberate (often new to the fish) approach can yield!
|
Another hold-over brown. |
A couple of the fish were from the upper end of the
creek, so they had great fins and colors.
No doubt they keep moving upstream all summer as the creek warms. I periodically catch wild fish in the
Manatawny, sometimes many of them together, especially in the dead of winter
when they tend to seek deep, quiet holes, but the population is climate-related
and cyclical, it seems. One guy I spoke
to this morning remarked, I often wonder what the place could be if they
stopped stocking? I have wondered that
too. I have taken a water temp of 70 in
July, however, so I am sure it warms up some years, but the Wissy in my
neighborhood, for example, will be seventy later this month. So, I caught a bunch of nice trout in nice
surroundings, and I even got to thank a landowner for allowing fishing to
continue on the creek. God bless you, he
replied. But then he had to ask me if the silver
pickup parked in his driveway was mine.
It wasn’t, but this highlights the problem.
|
A good rainbow in nice shape too. |
Some inconsiderate citizen/angler parked in a private
driveway when public parking was just 400 yards away, and the same dude will
cry about shrinking access to private lands in the state. We are all part of the problems and solutions. Perhaps my thanking the landowner, which I
felt earnestly compelled to do after the disappointing morning in the
headwaters of the watershed, bought us all a little time before he starts
posting in order to keep pickups out of his drive, worm containers out of his
back yard, and flies and spinners out of his lovely, manicured trees and
shrubs? Hell, I may even bring a trash
bag next time and clean up a little.
|
Grateful the access is still granted on this pretty stretch. |
Club water is awful.
ReplyDeleteIf we are talking about the same club, I have done well there in the past, but maybe it gets overfished now. If you are talking about clubs in general, yes, I am not always a fan of members only access. Especially since member is a time-tested euphemism for you know what...
ReplyDelete